THE long national nightmare is nearly over for Jeopardy! critics who can't stand Mayim Bialik.

Game show G.O.A.T. Ken Jennings will be back hosting episodes airing from July 3 until July 28.

7 Jeopardy! fans have taken issue with some of Mayim Bialik's judgments Credit: Getty

7 Many are waiting for Ken Jenning's pending return Credit: Getty

Many viewers have made it no secret they prefer the 74-time champion over Mayim for the gig.

The former Blossom star has been a thorn for fans who have argued and complained about some of her hosting rulings.

Mayim, 48, splits one of TV's most treasured roles with Ken and has hosted since early May.

She is stepping back out to support the WGA writers' strike so Ken returned to wrap up the season.

Legions of fans have been waiting to come back for the syndicated game show and celebrated the news in the replies.

"I had to stop watching until Ken is back," one person reacted.

"The show is so much better when he hosts, Thank God," wrote another.

"What is: News that makes me happy?" wrote a third as a fourth jumped in: "The King Is Back."

After July 28's episode, Jeopardy! will be off-screen until September.

Until then, fans can continue to debate Mayim's rulings and decisions, like the ones below.

NOT VERY EARNEST

7 Mayim had trouble reading one contestant's response and bluntly ruled: 'What is: I can't read that'

Viewers bashed Mayim for completely writing off a contestant's Final answer on June 9's episode.

Final Jeopardy! under BRITISH NOVELS read: "Midway through this 1928 novel, the title character briefly takes 'their' instead of his or her.'"

The contestant hastily scribbled: "What is the Importance of Being Ern..." but he ran out of time, an the last word trailed off.

Mayim bluntly replied when it was time to deem whether or not he was correct: “What is: I cannot read that."

The internet was quick to sound off on Mayim's breezy remark, with some accusing she didn't even know the book he was referencing.

One YouTube user wrote: "Mayim said ‘What is: I cannot read that’ in Final Jeopardy” with a cry-laugh emoji.

“So rude, ask what he wrote,” penned another.

“Unbelievable!! There's something she can't do???!! Say it ain't so!!!” ironically bashed a third.

NOT SO SWEET

7 Mayim was accused of not knowing the difference between a macaroon and macaron Credit: ABC

Earlier this month, Mayim was called out for allowing a response deemed incorrect by fans during the category Sweet Spots.

The host read off: "Founded in Paris, Ladurée offers these filled cookies in a rainbow of colors & flavors, including orange blossom."

One contestant answered: "What are macaroons?"

"Yes! Or Macaron," Mayim responded with a French accent.

Critics jumped online and blasted the TV host for not knowing the difference between a macaron and a macaroon.

One person said: “That wasn't the correct answer. Macaroons and macarons are two very different things- the ruling was not reversed by judges.

"The answer should've been MACARONS. Those are French pastries."

Another added: "Macaroon and macaron are different. Pretty sure macaroons are different than macarons."

NOT THE NET

7 Fans were furious after Mayim seemingly let an incorrect response slide Credit: ABC

Just days earlier, the Big Bang Theory star was shot down for letting what fans called a "clearly mispronounced" response slip through.

After offering the clue: "Some workplaces have this network of linked computers, sort of the company-wide web," one contestant responded "Internet," which Mayim accepted despite the correct response being "Intranet."

That was wrong, as the internet let her know.

Fans felt this was a cut-and-dry mistake as one tweeted: "Intranet is not internet."

"Are the judges asleep?" wrote another.

"Internet and intranet are not the same thing," wrote a third.

NOT RETURNING

7 Ben Chan's nine-day run as champ came to an end over Mayim’s supposedly harsh ruling Credit: ABC

Popular former champ Ben Chan was dethroned last month over an unforgiving ruling that fans called heartbreaking - if not flat-out questionable.

Final Jeopardy!, under "Shakespeare's Characters," read: "Both of the names of these 2 lovers in a Shakespeare play come from Latin words for 'blessed'."

Ben revealed he wrote “Beatrice & Benedict,” which, after a moment of pause, Mayim ruled it was incorrect.

"Unfortunately that is not correct," she told the baffled now ex-champ. "The correct response [is] Beatrice and Benedick."

“From Much Ado About Nothing,” Mayim concluded - but she didn't go further in explaining the judgment call.

According to Jeopardy!.com: “Written responses to the Final Jeopardy! clue do not have to be spelled correctly, but they must be phonetically correct and not add or subtract any extraneous sounds or syllables.”

Viewers hotly debated how Ben lost on social media, and if Ben's otherwise correct response did change the pronounciation enough to be wrong.

One person accused under a YouTube clip: “He was cheated. Completely unfair ruling on name Benedick."

“SHOCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OFF BY JUST 1 LETTER!” another simply wrote.

"Very rotten final ruling on Final @Jeopardy tonight. Google the answer and BOTH Benedick and Benedict come up. Both spellings are accepted," tweeted a third.

The ruling was not reversed by judges and execs stood by it saying they took a break to look into it when it happened.

EVERYONE'S WRONG

7 All three contestants were deemed incorrect on the same correct last name in May

Sometimes, everyone is deemed wrong by Mayim- all three contestants lost out on a clue after all apparently mispronounced an otherwise correct name.

Under the category The Quotable Alex, the clue read: "The author and former prisoner that said 'socialism of any type and shade leads to a total destruction of the human spirit.'"

The first contestant to buzz in guessed the right author, [Aleksandr] Solzhenitsyn, but she didn't say the Russian's name properly.

A second player also guessed the correct Solzhenitsyn; however, she, too, said the name wrong, and was ruled incorrect.

The final player buzzed in, answered with the author, and once again mangled the name.

Since none of the participants said the name correctly, they all lost $1,600 that would have come with getting it right.

Tons of fans online felt that it was unfair that all of the Jeopardy! players got penalized due to simply not pronouncing the answer right despite it being a correct choice.

Some fans explained in a thread on Reddit why they believed these types of tricky clues should be eliminated from the show.

"Something rubbed me the wrong way about that Solzhenitsyn clue; the show usually gives some strong leeway for if you can pronounce a response in a reasonable way given a spelling, and all 3 definitely knew who the clue was referring to," one person ranted.

"Give me a break. They all had the right name!" another viewer added.

One user said: "Hannah's pronunciation fit within the guideline of being reasonably supported by the spelling, so it should have been accepted."

While someone else broke down: "As I understand it, if it's phonetically reasonable, then they'll give it to you, and vowel sounds are pretty flexible, but if you screw up the consonants, they're going to rule against you."