Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more

A British consumer group has launched a legal challenge against a £9.1bn compensation scheme designed to redress motorists for mis-sold motor finance, a move described as "disappointing" by Britain's market regulator.

Consumer Voice announced on Monday it has applied to London's Upper Tribunal to contest the scheme, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) unveiled last month.

The FCA's final bill was a trimmed-down version, following pushback from lenders and the overturning of a landmark ruling by the UK's top court.

The FCA stated: "We are considering our approach and will set out more later this week."

While lenders such as Close Brothers and Santander have decided not to challenge the FCA's redress scheme, which the regulator said would allow consumers to receive compensation quickly, Consumer Voice argues it "fails to deliver fair, adequate or lawful consumer redress and systematically under-compensates consumers".

The group said in a statement that it believes "consumer redress has been minimised in order to protect lenders". The FCA said ‌the move could delay consumers receiving compensation ​and "also prolongs the uncertainty for ‌all involved, which is ⁠not good for investment or a ⁠healthy motor finance market".

The main industry body, Finance and Leasing Association (FLA), said it had “concerns” about the programme but that it was choosing not to raise a challenge. ( PA Wire )

Yesterday, the main industry body, Finance and Leasing Association (FLA), said it had “concerns” about the programme but that it was choosing not to raise a challenge.

It follows major lenders including Barclays and Lloyds also accepting the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) scheme despite raising concerns that the level of redress is disproportionate to those who suffered harm.

The FLA, which represents the UK’s motor finance firms, said it had considered how the regulator’s scheme would affect its members, their customers and the wider lending market given that it was “unprecedented in scale and scope, and the impact on the UK economy will be significant”.

“We continue to have concerns about aspects of the scheme, but our priority is that a practical solution be reached that ensures timely compensation for consumers while giving the motor finance industry and the wider market clarity and finality on this issue,” FLA chief executive Shanika Amarasekara said.

“For those reasons, we will not be challenging the FCA’s current scheme.”

Payouts are due on about 12.1 million mis-sold deals from an array of lenders at an average of £829 each, the financial watchdog said in March as it unveiled plans for its redress scheme.

The FCA expects the total amount of redress paid under its scheme to be about £7.5 billion, based on about 75% of eligible consumers making a claim.

Also taking into account the cost of running the scheme, such as dealing with the millions of complaints, the total bill rises to £9.1 billion.