May 4, 2026
By
Mandy Dalugdug
Credit: Mats Wiklund / Shutterstock
Spotify's name and logo on a glass door at the entrance to one of their offices in Stockholm, Sweden
A federal judge in New York has sent a lawsuit accusing
Spotify
of running a “modern payola” to arbitration, dismissing the plaintiff’s class action claims with prejudice.
In November,
Genevieve
Capolongo
, who describes herself as a
Spotify
subscriber,
sued the streaming giant
, alleging that it deceives users by letting labels boost song visibility through reduced royalty payments while marketing playlists as “personalized” recommendations.
Capolongo claimed Spotify’s
Discovery
ModeÂ
feature amounts to “modern payola,” the practice of paying for airplay that regulators have clamped down on since the vaudeville era.
Capolongo described herself as someone who had “long preferred music outside of the mainstream.” What she got instead, she alleged, was a feed of Drake, Zach Bryan, and Justin Bieber.
“Spotify’s playlists and recommendations are shaped by undisclosed pay-for-play arrangements and hidden commercial incentives,” Capolongo argued.
The lawsuit, which you canÂ
read here
, sought class-action status forÂ
100
Â
members
, seeking more thanÂ
$5 millionÂ
exclusive of costs and interest.
However, Judge
John G. Koeltl
of the Southern District of New York issued a ruing on April 30, granting Spotify’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissing the class allegations with prejudice.
“The plaintiff continued to use Spotify after receiving both notices and did not opt out of changes to the arbitration agreement.”
John G. Koeltl, US District Judge
Capolongo’s complaint sought class-action status on behalf of Spotify users across the US and asked the court to compel Spotify to disclose when playlist placement or recommendations are influenced by paid promotion or other commercial considerations. She had sought “only… a few dollars, roughly $5 to $21.”
In January, Spotify moved to push the case into arbitration, citing mandatory arbitration provision in its Terms of Use.
When Capolongo created her Spotify account in February 2021, she clicked through a screen that linked to the Terms of Use and stated that tapping ‘Create Account’ constituted agreement to those terms.
Spotify later updated its terms in March 2023 and again in August 2025, notifying her by email and in-app pop-up each time.
“Spotify provided the plaintiff with conspicuous notice of the Current Terms by email and by an inapp pop-up, both of which contained a conspicuous hyperlink to the Current Terms and provided the plaintiff with the opportunity to review the applicable arbitration agreement.”
John G. Koeltl, US District Judge
“The plaintiff continued to use Spotify after receiving both notices and did not opt out of changes to the arbitration agreement,” Judge Koeltl wrote in his order, which you can
read here
.
The judge added: “Spotify provided the plaintiff with conspicuous notice of the Current Terms by email and by an inapp pop-up, both of which contained a conspicuous hyperlink to the Current Terms and provided the plaintiff with the opportunity to review the applicable arbitration agreement.”
“And the plaintiff manifested her assent to the Current Terms when she continued to use Spotify after receiving notice of the updated terms.”
With arbitration ordered, the class claims fell through. According to Spotify’s terms: “YOU AND SPOTIFY AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER IN ARBITRATION OR LITIGATION
ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY
AND
NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER
IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS, COLLECTIVE, CONSOLIDATED, PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR REPRESENTATIVE ACTION.”
Capolongo had argued that the arbitration agreement is unenforceable “because it provides for inadequate discovery.”
The two parties will now take their dispute to the National Arbitration and Mediation for resolution. Judge Koeltl said, “this case is stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration.”
Music Business Worldwide
News
Sweden
lawsuits
payola
Spotify
Related Posts
Spotify Co-CEOs outline AI ambitions and more on Q1 2026 earnings call
Spotify subscriber base grew by 3m to 293m in Q1; company posted $837M operating profit for the quarter
Spotify to show AI tags in Song Credits, where artists have chosen to disclose through their label or distributor
Spotify strikes deal with National Independent Venue Association to boost indie venues in the US