Electronic Arts’ decision to lay off nearly 6% of its workforce is shortsighted. Despite being a major player in the market and reporting record profits, the company still made the decision to lay off a significant portion of its workforce. This decision offers no guarantees that the company’s financial situation will improve, and it ignores the potential value that employees could bring to the company.

Rather than reevaluating its priorities, EA seems intent on ruthlessly slashing costs to boost profits in the here and now. The job cuts fly in the face of a company’s duty to stabilize employment and support its many hardworking employees.

EA claims it must “drive greater focus” across its operations, but layoffs are not the solution to strategic questions or reallocation of resources. They will only sow discontent, hurt morale, and undermine a company’s culture, talent, and capacity for continued innovation.

Valuing greed over stability has few upsides. Instead, companies should focus on cutting costs by looking for more creative solutions like streamlining operations and reducing overhead, or investing in long-term initiatives such as training and development programs that can help to create a more productive and engaged workforce.

Layoffs also disregard how much knowledge and institutional memory walk out the door. They show a misguided obsession with metrics and margins over building a durable, high-performing organization. EA gambles its future success and productivity on cost-cutting rather than investing in its people and key capabilities.

When a company lays off employees, it not only loses the valuable knowledge and expertise that those employees possess, but it also loses the corporate culture they bring to the company.

This means that the morale of the remaining employees may plummet, and the company may not be able to retain its competitive advantage in the market. Investing in employees and key capabilities is the more sustainable option for long-term success and productivity.

While EA’s CEO aims to “provide opportunities” for transitions, many livelihoods will be upended. Severance is small solace for the unknowns of unemployment, financial hardship, or being forced into new roles or companies. Loyal employees now face the anxiety of job insecurity through no fault of their own. They rightly question the commitment to their well-being and futures.

This transition is causing tremendous anxiety and uncertainty for those affected, leading them to question the commitment to their well-being and future that they had previously experienced with their employer.

Rather than layoffs, EA should pursue other options to improve focus and reduce costs without involuntarily terminating staff. Hiring freezes, office downsizing, retraining programs, and project prioritization are more ethical solutions, as is improving operational efficiency without gutting the ranks.

Corporate decisions should balance business needs and human needs – not sacrifice one for the other. Layoffs should always be an absolute last resort, not a first move as is the case here. EA has chosen the wrong path, one that will damage its reputation, restrain future progress, and haunt its conscience. The cost to the company and community will be high if this unjustifiable course is not corrected. EA has just announced the launch of their new game, “Layoffs: The Sequel”!