Adams, G. S., Converse, B. A., Hales, A. H., & Klotz, L. E. (2021). People systematically overlook subtractive changes. Nature, 592(7853), 258–261.
Ashworth, J., Heyndels, B., & Werck, K. (2010). Expert judgements and the demand for novels in flanders. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34(3), 197–218.
Barber, B. M., Heath, C., & Odean, T. (2003). Good reasons sell: Reason-based choice among group and individual investors in the stock market. Management Science, 49(12), 1636–1652.
Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment-how can experts know so much and predict so badly?.
Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. (2021). The sequence effect in panel decisions: Evidence from the evaluation of research and development projects. Organization Science.
Dekker, E. (2016). Exemplary goods: Exemplars as judgment devices. Valuation Studies, 4(2), 103–124.
Dekker, E., & de Jong, M. (2018). What do book awards signal? An analysis of book awards in three countries. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 36(1), 3–21.
English, J. F. (2014). The economics of cultural awards. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, volume 2, pages 119–143. Elsevier.
Frey, B. S., & Gallus, J. (2017). Towards an economics of awards. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1), 190–200.
Gemser, G., Leenders, M. A., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2008). Why some awards are more effective signals of quality than others: A study of movie awards. Journal of Management, 34(1), 25–54.
Ginsburgh, V. (2003). Awards, success and aesthetic quality in the arts. Journal of Economic perspectives, 17(2), 99–111.
Ginsburgh, V., & Van Ours, J. C. (2003). Expert opinion and compensation: Evidence from a musical competition. American Economic Review, 93(1), 289–296.
Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (1999). On the perceived quality of movies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(4), 269–283.
Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2014). Nominees, winners, and losers. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(4), 291–313.
Hicks, A., & Petrova, V. (2006). Auteur discourse and the cultural consecration of american films. Poetics, 34(3), 180–203.
Hsee, C. K., Rottenstreich, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2005). When is more better? on the relationship between magnitude and subjective value. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 234–237.
Irwin, J. R., & Davis, J. H. (1995). Choice/matching preference reversals in groups: Consensus processes and justification-based reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 325–339.
Jacobsen, G. D. (2015). Consumers, experts, and online product evaluations: Evidence from the brewing industry. Journal of Public Economics, 126, 114–123.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.
Klayman, J., & Brown, K. (1993). Debias the environment instead of the judge: An alternative approach to reducing error in diagnostic (and other) judgment. Cognition, 49(1–2), 97–122.
Kovács, B., & Sharkey, A. J. (2014). The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 1–33.
Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., Van Boven, L., & Altermatt, T. W. (2004). The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 91–98.
Lea, R. (2015). The big question: Are books getting longer?.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255.
Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1994). The nature of salience: An experimental investigation of pure coordination games. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 658–673.
Milkman, K. L., Carmona, R., & Gleason, W. (2007). A statistical analysis of editorial influence and author-character similarities in 1990s New Yorker fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(3), 305–328.
Milkman, K. L., Payne, J. W., & Soll, J. B. (2015). A user’s guide to debiasing. WileyBlackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.
Minson, J. A., Mueller, J. S., & Larrick, R. P. (2018). The contingent wisdom of dyads: When discussion enhances vs. undermines the accuracy of collaborative judgments. Management Science, 64(9), 4177–4192.
Morewedge, C. K., Kassam, K. S., Hsee, C. K., & Caruso, E. M. (2009). Duration sensitivity depends on stimulus familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 177.
Moseley, M., et al. (2019). How the booker prize won the prize. American, British and Canadian Studies, 33, 206–221.
National-Book-Awards (2021). National Book Awards website. https://www.nationalbook.org/national-book-awards/how-works/. [Online; accessed 20-September-2021].
Nelson, R. A., Donihue, M. R., Waldman, D. M., & Wheaton, C. (2001). What’s an Oscar worth? Economic Inquiry, 39(1), 1–6.
Pardoe, I., & Simonton, D. K. (2008). Applying discrete choice models to predict academy award winners. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 171(2), 375–394.
Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2015). Experts’ awards and economic success: Evidence from an Italian literary prize. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(4), 341–367.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict: With a new preface by the author. Harvard University Press.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513.
Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(2), 252–266.
Sherman, S. (2022). The greatest books.
Slovic, P. (1975). Choice between equally valued alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3), 280.
Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99(1), 3.
Stewart, N., Brown, G. D., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112(4), 881.
Tetlock, P. E. (2009). Expert political judgment. Princeton University Press.